爽！

Nekotopia（中譯《殺死99隻貓的少女》）
作者：明日香‧藤森
譯者：王玲琇
出版社：圓神書活網

心情極度興奮中，今晚追書追到沒完沒了！

這是我第一次接觸黑色幽默~
哇哇哇，好爽呀！句句一矢中的，針針刺中心臟！
哈，我知道，如果我自己冇咁黑，係唔會覺得爽ga！
我覺得爽，因為文字裏的黑和我心裏的黑接軌，大家好有共鳴！
當然，亦反映我實在幼稚透頂，竟然能如此陶醉地不務正業，而三個星期之後考試......
心的另一邊告訴我，這本書是不會為社會帶來任何實際可行的改善作用的。小說如何用利刀剖析，它不能改變現實。

不過，實在好爽！

============================

30-12-2005 1542

經過一晚衝刺，我明白了一個道理：
作姦犯科就好比演奏鋼琴，想要達到某種出神入化的境界就得趁早開始！

拋開

把多年的信念拋開

一剎那間，很亢奮。

再一剎那間，很低落。



如此循迴，

既夠，未夠。

灰色

灰色。

感受很多，積成一團，很難消化。
功課考試要來了，得趕快應付。

有時，太敏感不是一件好事。

每一個畫面、每一個音符、每一下動作、每一種語氣...... 都訴說著很多。
多得我們平時都不察覺，甚至無視它們的存在。

潛意識太重了。

不懂得為何我仍在笑，天天的笑，眼淚不懂得流出來。

這樣一團糟的生活，為何我仍能過呢？

灰色。

矇矓裏仍能看見一切；不會撞死，也不會迷路。生活仍在自己的掌握中。
一切就只那麼多了一層輕輕的迷霧。包圍著。
不知何故。

聖誕節，收到一張傳單，上面寫著 "Have you been saved?", 下面有一段字：
"All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away. If you, O Lord kept a record of sins, O Lord, who can stand? But with you there is forgiveness: therefore you are feared. Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures... that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name." ------ HOLY BIBLE

哈哈，上半段寫得相當一矢中的，人類的魚腥味臭屎味我算是聞過了，臭得作嘔... 有誰不像秋葉一飄而過？又有誰能站得住腳呢...~ 只是，如果我們接受自己，不亢不卑，和相信寬恕帶來的釋放又有多大分别呢？

"Whoever believes in the Son have eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for Gods wrath remains on him." ------- HOLY BIBLE

Wrath...用到個咁兇既字。
我而家都見唔到life... 信你，又會見到d咩呢~

所有上半段都講得好中，但係上半段同下半段是沒有必然關係的。

仍然灰色。

由得我把生活支離破碎開，再重新拼合吧。我想看得見這個大世界。

既夠未夠。

Me and the WTO... a letter I couldn't stop writing

Wesley,

I couldn't help but to stop myself from dwelling into the notes and start writing an email to you. It has been some time since the phone call when I told you that I can no longer stand simple slogans and straight forward black-and-white reasons for going to, or organizing, protests. Well, the problem simply lingers on.

I’ve tried my best to pull up myself and seize some of the opportunities in the WTO week to learn more. I’m glad the learning experience was great. The world becomes a lot bigger then I’ve ever imagined. I realized how stupid I am – thinking this little Hong Kong is the centre of the whole world. Problem as small as an ant had been an elephant in my eyes. Perhaps I should admit, it has become more and more difficult for me to yell “No” to something, especially after the WTO week.

I wonder where the hack truth is. Everybody talk about love, faith, justice and all that. I used to think I’m no where wrong if I go with FES and the big international NGOs. Now I realize just how big the NGO world is. People have different stances and different opinions based on different perspectives, priorities, and interests. They collaborate and dissemble strategically guided mostly by common interests. The thought of “these interactions are necessary to generate the common good”, “adding these all up will give you the final positive picture” has been comforting for some months, but now no longer.

I couldn’t stop myself from having some kind of weird feeling towards the WTO protests. (I do understand their importance and their reason to be here.) I’ve noticed a certain kind of discordance between the insides and outsides of the Convention Centre. It’s like people are talking in completely different languages. Yelling “No” outside the Centre means nothing to the technical and political negotiations inside. To get a protesting farmer into the Centre is not going to yield anything productive. These people are indeed useful outside, but someone must go into the centre to deal with the complicated scenario so that protestors’ dream (-sssssss?) may come true.

Let me reiterate, I realize, to some extent, how unfair and nasty the situation is now (don’t think I can ever realize all). I stand fully to the support of fairness and equality, and personally, the Western Goddess of Justice (remember the sculptures in Victoria Park during the WTO week?) has already become a part of my heart. However I don’t think yelling is enough. Yelling is merely the first step to the whole matter. It will not be nice if our understanding remains so one-sided, so black-and-white, and so simple.

To add a bit, I think it is quite foolish to dwell in the discussion of “police performance and misbehaviors” as one of the most important WTO discussion topics. I realize the arrests, but the police cannot help but to become WTO-watchdogs once the HK Government is responsible for the conference. Perhaps the more proper question is why the government wants to held this conference, and the arguments go back to “building up the image of Hong Kong” and all that.

This letter shows quite an extensive bit of relativism that I did not hold onto before. I admit that I’m in a break-down process – breaking down those built up in FES for the past 3 years. I’m beginning to see Christianity in complete new eyes – maybe the most ordinary pair of eyes one can get from anyone else in the street – but this is significant for me.

So this is the only (and very much belated) Christmas present I present to you. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Siuman

Me and WTO.. just writing what's in my mind

沒有責任在身，果然無官一身輕。
很自由，想做什麼就做什麼。

Still excited about the idea of building myself up in an environment with different kinds of people. Fascinated with the wide range of interactions one can have with each other. Everybody is just so unique and so valuable you wanna respect them. At last we're coming to the same environment, the same culture, the same language. We start to understand and communicate, in the mist of all the differences, like upbringing, personality, values, religion, lifestyles, financial habits etc.

I'm really pretty naive about all these... but it's the first time I learned that you've got to expect spendings in Papua New Guinea just the same as those you spend in Australia. Reason? PNG has no local production. No farming. No industries. No jobs. People live with potatoes everyday. All goods are imported from Australia and other developed countries. Yes, ALL.

The Western Goddess of Justice, again.
This was the only thing that went across my mind - and stayed lingering for long hours - after I learn about all these.

Just as what I've mentioned earlier, I became much more open to yelling "Down Down WTO!" after last week. If that's what it means to open up a market, I'd rather Papua New Guinea remains in her old stone-age era, which was just 50 years ago.

Matters are complicated when you stand yourself on the developed world and look over to the developing world. But they were very simple when you stand on the developing world and look the other way round. Very simple. Just give up your wealth, give up your luxurious lifestyle.

The thing is simply bloody unfair.

I wonder what the EU / US trade commissioners feel when they concluded the Doha round last week. Both were working furiously hard trying to prevent the wealthiest from being less wealthy; in the face of two-thirds of the world who were trying to get a penny out of the wealthiests' pockets in order to sustain life.
And this was the Doha round. A round supposed to give priorities to bringing developing countries out of poverty.

I start to understand, why a lot of people wanted to abolish the WTO. It's all a matter of perspectives. People like to excuse themselves from understanding the heart of the matter by saying "Oh it's so complicated", while the solution lies in giving priorities - most of the time simple yet hard to do - to all the different parties whose interests conflicts each other. With a bit more tact, win-win situations, or near win-win, can be achieved. It's like cutting small pieces of fat gradually from the fat women and sticking them onto the poor thin man's body, while the fat lady feels no or minimal pain and thinks she's having a liposuction which is for her own good. There are still people out there who makes perfect sense and is brave enough to explore and work through the conflicting interests. To me, that may be the last bit of hope.

梁啟智﹕灣仔的所謂「騷亂」

作者為美國明尼蘇達大學地理學博士生

數日前還令香港人感動的和平示威者，為何轉眼間會變成漠視香港非暴力傳統的暴民﹖理由很簡單，因為世貿協議不是由香港人一人一票投票決定的。要評論示威者的對與錯，先要接受世貿的政治尺度（political scale）不是香港，而是世界。

這看似顯然易見的道理，香港傳媒的評論似乎並不理解。近日多數有關世貿示威的評論，都是以香港傳統的示威邏輯出發，硬套在外來的示威者之上，進而評點其抗爭手段的對錯。正是如此，香港的報章才會有「暴民襲港」或「港人動容」之類以香港為中心的頭條。

普羅論述謂香港的示威素來和平守法，卻忽視了這個非暴力傳統是建基於香港獨有的政治體制之下。港人在香港搞示威，目的是要顯示其立場受群眾支持，並進而爭取更多的認同。因為相關的政治尺度只限於香港，香港人的感受才會重要。所以無論民主黨或民建聯都不會搞暴力抗爭，背後的考慮不單是原則，更是選票。

外來示威者沒有這個考慮。和本地示威者不同，他們的第一目的不是贏取港人的支持。反正世貿協議又不是由港人投票決定的，港人是否支持並非核心問題，如果支持也只是錦上添花。示威者的目的也不是要進入會場，雖然行動上看起來是。但這行動卻是一個過程，最終的目的是爭取國際傳媒的注意。外來示威者寧可被香港的傳媒描黑，也要得到歐美傳媒的報道，是個很合邏輯的選擇。

只要把尺度一轉，便幾可確定示威者其實是「成功」了。以美國版的有線電視新聞網絡為例，連日來也只是報道美國國內的新聞，到了昨晚才把世貿放上頭條。是政治尺度的不平衡決定了抗爭的方法﹕香港警察要向香港市民負責，外來示威者面對的卻是國際輿論﹔所以暴力抗爭才會成為「指定動作」，前線警員也就成為代罪羔羊。

不從示威者角度考慮

批評流於表面

正是如此，對示威的評論才會陷入尺度的落差。香港民意對暴力抗爭的底線定得高，國際輿論卻恐怕要到了恐怖襲擊才會譴責。灣仔的所謂「騷亂」，正正就在這兩條底線之間。我不是要為暴力辯護，而是如果我們不用示威者的角度來考慮其動機，對他們的批評就注定要流於表面。

各位專業或業餘或茶餐廳時事評論員，請不要再用港人的尺度來衡量這次抗爭。香港的進步力量也許想以和平手段逐步教育大眾認識世貿，然而外來示威者所爭的卻是朝夕。無論我們如何不滿，也和遊戲規則的本身毫不相關，因為這就是世貿。

對，這次會議雖然由香港主辦，但無論是會場內外的規則其實都不由香港人決定，而是按照未必和香港相關的國際慣例進行。這種對本土特性的漠視其實就是世貿的本質。香港人一向自認精明，為何參加了這種甚為搵笨的組織，還要主動幫忙舉辦會議，卻是個該認真思考的問題。

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/051218/12/1jogs.html

Teargas

My first taste of teargas~ tonight in Wan Chai with the Korean protestors.
They have gave me a 馬仔 during our walk together!!

當我回到宿舍，洗澡的時候，腦裏浮現出一個問題...
如果說暴力，會展場內的一句說話，一個簽名，足以使幾百萬人失業、失學、甚至失去性命。這種慢性殺人，不比場外的示威者更暴力嗎？在這種角度之下，誰是暴民？

Justitia (Western Goddess of Justice)

"I'm sitting on the back of a man
He is sinking under the burden
I would do anything to help him
Except stepping down from his back."

Justitia (Western Goddess of Justice)

By Denish sculptor and activist Jens Galschiot. (That's him in the photograph)

Tagged.. the 8 requirements for your ideal lover (edited)

1. When you are tagged, you must list the 8 requirements for your ideal lover.
2. Indicate who you were tagged by?

Hints:
1. You must state that you ideal lover is a male or female. (I think homosexual is allowed to play this game too.)
2. Tag another 5 people by leaving them this comment: "Congratulation, you have been tagged. Check out my xanga and learn how to play this game." <--I'll ignore this =P
3. If you have been tagged for this game, but you have completed this game upon this tagging, you can disregard the tag.

Tagged by: Celia, Patrick

Gender of my Ideal Lover: 男
1. 愛我，能包容我
2. 相同價值觀
3. 我包容到佢
4. 成熟，深度了解自己內心世界
5. Open to change, both self and the environment, irrespective of age
6. Open to learnand improve, both hard knowledges and life qualities, irrespective of age
7. 懂表達和處理情緒，善於溝通
8. 不會逞強

The only person I tag: Terence

睇到作嘔.......

看新聞看得有點作嘔了。一篇接一篇有關世貿的報導，全都只是有關交通安排、塞車情況、全港各界各施各法預防暴力事件、南韓農民就黎殺到啦要小心安全呀....etc

試想想，如果各大傳媒報導八九民運，只說學生進行暴動，不斷進行危險性高的要協性動作，市民很害怕但難以預防受到波及，政府日常運作受到巨大影響十分可 憐，以及軍警無辜受傷真是冤枉等等... 你會接受這種報導嗎？這種報導，完全漠視中共混亂的政治背景，漠視人民抑壓多年積慮的憤怒；是否合適的報導手法呢？

慘在，現在香港各大傳媒報導世貿的角度，就是這一種。。。

嘔........

世貿相關活動行程(2)

大部份活動都冇乜人陪...如果你都有興趣的話，搵埋我一齊去啦！

十二月十日（六）
1. Oxfam Big Noise Day
2. 消除貧困日(第三期) White Band Day III
全球消除貧困聯盟 Global Call to Action against Poverty (GCAP)
==>下午要返HKUFI上live case, 夜晚或者去行一陣掛.... 唔會夜走。

十二月十一日（日）
「抗議世貿官商勾結」大遊行、文化表演
民間監察世貿聯盟
大遊行 下午2:00 維園足球場集合 遊行前往政府總部
1330-1400 祈禱會 香港教會組織 維園
2000 文化大笪地
==>下午要Family Follow Up，唔去得。Follow Up 完之後應該會出去行下。

十二月十三日（二）
世貿開幕日
開幕遊行，不過我想上堂，唔去。
不過，其實應該幾多野睇的。
落堂之後，會睇下即時新聞，如果有料到的話就出去維園睇下。

十二月十四日（三）
中國與世貿：新中國概略及捍衛社會公義集體行動的興起
CHINA and the WTO: What to know about the New China and the emerging collective actions for social justice
6.00pm - 10.00pm 小童群益會 Boys and Girls Club
http://www.focusweb.org/component/option,com_extcalendar/Itemid,/

十二月十五日（四）
1. 發展中國家的特殊及差別待遇
Special and Differential treatment for Developing Countries
9.30am - 12.00noon 諾仕酒店 Knutsford Hotel
德國夏域堡基金會 Heinrich Böll Foundation (HBF), 德國監察 Germanwatch
==>如果visit完食環署之後仲有時間就會去。

2. 新自由主義的現行代理人 反雙邊及地區自由貿易協議案例
WTO and FTAs: Complimentary Agents of Neoliberalism
The Case Against Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)
3.00pm - 6.00pm 小童群益會 Boys and Girls Club
http://www.focusweb.org/component/option,com_extcalendar/Itemid,/
==>考慮緊去唔去....

3. 世貿 / 全球化：危害兒童世界世貿的經濟暴力，也談全球化、戰爭及帝國（Wesley@FES帶隊）
14:30@天后地鐵站恒生銀行等
主辦機構：東南亞兒童權益協會和平生命
==>2或3擇其一

十二月十六日（五）
1. Trade and Health Policy Coherence for Human Development
Hong Kong Trade and Development Symposium
10.15-12.45: Room 402, Hong Kong Exhibition Centre
Organiser: World Health Organisation (WHO)
==>又一走堂之作~ =p

2. 我們的姊妹會遇上甚麼？當年青婦女遇上中年婦女 (型塑全球化：婦女的抵抗與出路)
What Happened to us Sisters? An Encounter Young Women’s Dialogue with Maturing Women(“Shaping Globalization: Women’s Resistance and Alternatives”)
0900-1200, 1300-1500 @維園
Organiser: 東南亞婦女關注全球化及世貿、婦女反貧窮及全球化遊行
Southeast Asian Women Taking on Globalization and WTO / Women’s March Against Poverty and Globalization
==>聽完上面的talk之後去。

3. 國際貿易協議的決策過程民主化：以色列的處境
Democratization of decision making processes regarding international trade agreements
- the Israel scenario
2.00pm- 3.00pm 諾仕酒店 Knutsford Hotel
中東地球之友 Friend of Earth Middle East
http://foeme.org/events.php?ind=13
==>睇下維園吸引D，定係佢吸引D，再決定聽邊個啦。

十二月十七日（六）
1. 戰爭與貿易：伊拉克：全球化與戰爭的起爆點
War and Trade: Iraq: Ground Zero of Globalization and War
6.00pm- 10.00pm 小童群益會 Boys and Girls Club
http://www.focusweb.org/component/option,com_extcalendar/Itemid,/
==>我應該會去呢個，聽完個talk先去演唱會度睇下。

2. 大型演唱會 (修頓球場)（Wesley@FES帶隊）
集合時間地點：17:45@灣仔三聯書店 香港灣仔軒尼詩道158號 (灣仔地鐵站 A4 出口)
主辦機構： 東南亞漁民聯盟
==>閉幕前夕大型演唱會

十二月十八日（日）
世貿閉幕日
抗議世貿：反對官商勾結 捍衛尊嚴生活　
「繼續抗爭，向世貿說『不』！」集會、遊行
民間監察世貿聯盟 [世貿閉幕日]
下午2:00 維園足球場集合
遊行前往灣仔公眾示威區
==>去睇下，一個下午見十幾個(or up)國家，抵玩呀~

告全港警務人員書

http://www.inmediahk.net/public/article?group%5fid=72&item%5fid=82369
值得看，簽名支持，及傳開。

世貿相關活動行程

世貿殺到...~~ 未唸定去邊度好...實在有太多野啦，又唔係個個都真係咁值得去。
暫時決定去二個活動，都是和醫療與公共衛生有關的。

第一個是無國界醫生搞的講座。

「世貿對病人獲得所需藥物的影響：中國探討」座談會

針對禽流感有可能在全球大規模擴散，世界各地爭相搶購流感藥「特敏福（Tamiflu）」，這種藥物的專利權、藥價等問題頓時引起全球關注；但每一天威脅 著人們生命的又豈只禽流感？愛滋病、結核病、瘧疾、黑熱病等很多不同的傳染病，每年奪取一千四百萬人的生命，只要有合適藥物，很多死亡可以避免。他們得不 到所需藥物的其中一個原因，就是藥物專利導致藥價高企，遠超病人的負擔能力以外。這個講座就是要探討世貿對病人獲得所需藥物造成的影響。

日期：二零零五年十二月九日 (星期五)
時間：下午二時至五時
地點：香港大學圖書館大樓新翼許磐卿講堂LE1室
主持：香港大學社會科學研究中心主任白景崇(Dr J Bacon-Shone)
講者：知識產權署署長謝肅方(Mr Stephen Richard Selby)、無國界醫生「病者有其藥」運動政策倡議總監Ms Ellen’t Hoen、無國界醫生「病者有其藥」運動幹事Ms Suerie Moon
合辦機構︰無國界醫生香港辦事處、香港大學環球學(Global Studies Program)、香港大學醫療及衛生規劃研究網絡(Medical and Health Research Network of HKU)


第二個是世界衛生組織搞的講座。
這是一堆NGOsss合辦的symposium裏面其中一個plenary，是這堆NGOsss趁著WTO開會的時間搞的。雖然在上一次世貿部長級會議 中，各國原則上同意「發展中國家可以為解決公共健康問題在藥物專利保護上施行例外」，但實際上如何執行，仍然路遙漫漫，十劃未有一pit... 這個plenary會建議這條路應如何發展。
另外，plenary裏亦會講到食品安全問題，以及把醫療服務變成商業活動（eg 跨國醫療集團好似mcdonalds咁向全世界開分店）的可能性和隱憂。當然，全部野都係講緊政策層面啦。

Trade and Health Policy Coherence for Human Development

Hong Kong Trade and Development Symposium
Dec 16 10.15-12.45: Room 402, Hong Kong Exhibition Centre
Organiser: World Health Organisation (WHO)
詳情可看這裏。

Question

以下內容抄自benbirdie的日記。
給日記原主：我沒有事先得你准許，希望你不介意。

===============================

Today, is a bad day.

Witnessed a termination of pregnancy at 23.5 weeks of gestation.
Indication: Amniocentesis revealed monosomy X, Turner Syndrome 45,X (mosaic type)
Procedure: Inject KCl to stop the baby's heart beat, then insert prostagladin to induce labour so that the mother will deliver the dead fetus.

The patient came with her mother. Before the procedure, the mother stated clearly that she does not want to see the baby after it is born. She refused any future notice of results of the baby whatsoever.

Then she was told to lie down on a bed beside the ultrasound machine in the ward. She was told that it would be like doing amniocentesis. She closed her eyes, refusing to see anything related to this baby.

Was she disgusted about this defective baby? Does she feel ashamed about her?

No. Couldnt be. Afterall, she had been carrying her for almost 6 months. It is her daughter. I guess she did not want her decision to be shaken. She doesnt want to carry this psychological burden to her next baby.

An ultrasound scan was performed to locate the best position for insertion. I saw the fetal heart beat, I saw her head, I saw her limbs. She looked so helpless, yet, there was nothing I could do.

The procedure began.

The first injection was to kill pain.

Then the real thing came. A needle was inserted into the fetal heart, guided by ultrasound. Without hesitation, the doc inserted the needle. The fetus moved.

Did she feel pain? Did she sense danger? Was she pleading for mercy? Was she just trying her last effort to kick her mother, so that she would change her mind?

The first attempt failed, because the baby moved. The doc adjusted the position again. The fetus moved. Adjustment. The fetus moved again. The fetal heart was still beating.

The patient's mother started weeping. My eyes got watery.

Readjustment. The needle reached the ventricles. The nurse injected 3ml KCl.

5 sec later. The fetal heart was still beating, weakly. Even when everyone else had given up on her, she was not ready to give up.

Another 1ml KCl.

It stopped.

End of procedure.

=================================

I have went thru my Obs and Gyne already.
G5P0+4 is not uncommon.
The average waiting time for IVF is 5-6 years.
Though controversial, at least she has a reason. The 2 most common reasons for TOP are "psychological disturbance" and "population control".

Do you understand medicine? I don't.

遊行雜感

昨天的遊行，去與不去，心中一直很大爭扎。
想去，因為實在期望一個普選時間表，亦不認同把區議會拉下水是進步的做法。
不想去，因為泛民主派的政治騷，實在看得生厭，甚至反胃。演政治騷是真正對香港前途好嗎？我有懷疑。
昨天，亦是一個標貼力很強的日子。無論參加遊行與否，每一個人都必定會被標貼。
在呀爺大哂的局面之下，我搞不懂，是擇善固執比較清高，是進退游說保存實力比較聰明，還是理解現狀放下堅持比較實際。

我只知道，(香港)史無前例地，竟然做到一個十多廿萬人的遊行只有一個訴求。
當然，支持普選但爭扎甚至決定不參加遊行的人也有不少。

而我自己，最終選擇以觀察的心態到場。四時左右到達灣仔修頓球場，一直向銅鑼灣走，看著頭隊貨車駛過，到四時四十五分左右插隊走到政府總部。
環繞自己的氣氛是出奇地平和。沒有紛亂的訴求，沒有不知所謂的人士利用遊行吸引人注意毫不相關的事情，大家都很清楚自己是為什麼而來。（預計沒有什麼人參加的活動果然有其好處，不清晰了解和支持大會立場的人通常不會出現。）
中產家庭（帶同小孩），有政治敏感度的年青人，思想清晰滿肚墨水和經驗的老年人。來的人似乎都比較清晰，普選是什麼，普選有什麼好處。
我的感覺，是民間民主聲音的大集結。(不是扶貧，不是醫療改革，不是.......）
是一種很有方向感的感覺。

回想起03年7月1日，我走在五十萬人的前頭。當時我是大會的義工，分配到頭隊，有份拉起巨幅橫額，與阻塞去路的記者對抗，衝出重圍開始遊行。
05年12月4日，我選擇以觀察的心態，試驗性地到場。
是什麼帶來這種改變？
可能是人現實了，發現崇高的呼喊之所以崇高，是因為實在不實際，所以很少人會選擇這種態度。
沒有人能介定何種取態比較必須。沒有崇高呼喊的推動，就不會產生實際的談判和一點點如蟻步的前行。沒有實際的談判和處理，崇高呼喊只會愈來愈脫離現實。兩者互相衍生，唇齒相依。

唔。突然間很有道家的味道。很玄。
(其實故弄玄虛~~ hehe~~ =p)